![]() Finally, reader Serge worked with me to come up with a workable solution that resolves the port range problem but still works fine with multiple hosts. ![]() ![]() In hindsight, the reason none of these suggestions sat right with me is because all the examples assumed you only had one host behind the NAT configuration. Many readers have offered suggestions and links to other documents around the Internet offering various solutions, but none of them really sat quite right with me. As you might recall, I had previously taken umbrage with Cisco's inability to forward a range of ports to a particular host.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |